Franklin's Official "Unofficial" News Source
By Dr. Richard Busalacchi, Publisher - Franklin Community News
“Fox 6 would have quite a real story if they researched and looked up on CCAP the main person behind this all, not hard to do as he’s been on the front page of the JS to more in a very negative way. This is all of my own personal opinion (in which I must state).”
In the same exchange, Eichmann added:
“WAPD has had this investigation since May I believe & if it was something we wouldn’t be here in December with no answers as they are an excellent department. CH 6 was offered the actual finance and campaign reports (also filed with the state) and to my understanding declined to even take them, which is laughable. They could also pull an open records request for them easily. It’s also the start of a new campaign season, go figure!”
Eichmann’s comments did not address the substance of the allegations contained in the unsealed search warrant. Instead, they redirected attention toward the background of a private publisher whose reporting preceded the investigation.
What’s Not in Dispute
According to FOX6 News and public records:
-
West Allis Police are investigating Franklin Mayor John Nelson for possible misconduct in public office
-
The investigation involves alleged misuse of city funds tied to social media and marketing activity
-
A search warrant related to the investigation has been unsealed
-
Mayor Nelson has not been charged
-
Mayor Nelson declined FOX6’s request for an interview, citing illness, but indicated he may speak at a later time
These facts are established by FOX6 reporting and publicly available documents.
Additional Public Interventions by Eichmann
Eichmann has continued to comment directly on FOX6 posts about the investigation.
In a separate FOX6 thread posted just hours later, Eichmann wrote:
“Yet, you never met with the Mayor today to interview….”
Another commenter replied:
“Are you his spokesperson?”
Eichmann responded:
“If you can do a better job, RUN! D3 is up for re election this Spring as well as the Mayor’s seat.”
Eichmann did not deny acting as a spokesperson, nor did she clarify her role in relation to the mayor or the investigation.
Questions Raised by Eichmann’s Statements
Eichmann’s public comments raise several legitimate and unresolved questions:
-
How would a Franklin alderwoman know when West Allis Police began their investigation?
West Allis Police have not publicly disclosed investigative timelines.
-
How would Eichmann know what materials FOX6 was offered or declined?
FOX6 has not stated publicly that it refused any documents.
-
Why redirect public attention away from the mayor under investigation and toward a private publisher’s CCAP history?
CCAP records reflect case outcomes, not the origins, credibility, or legality of complaints.
-
Why is an alderwoman publicly commenting on an active investigation at all, while the subject of that investigation has declined to speak?
-
Why has Eichmann repeatedly positioned herself as a defender or intermediary for the mayor, rather than referring questions to the mayor, counsel, or the City’s communications staff?
Silence from the Mayor
FOX6 reported that Mayor Nelson declined to comment when contacted, citing illness. As of publication, no public interview or formal statement from the mayor addressing the substance of the search warrant or investigation has been released.
Eichmann, however, chose to comment repeatedly and publicly — not about the allegations outlined in the warrant, but about the motives, background, and credibility of the individual whose reporting brought the issue to light.
Why This Matters
Public confidence in government depends on transparency, restraint, and clearly defined roles — especially during active investigations.
When an elected official:
-
comments publicly on an ongoing investigation,
-
suggests knowledge of law-enforcement timelines not disclosed to the public,
-
asserts what media outlets were allegedly offered or declined,
-
and redirects scrutiny away from the subject of a search warrant,
the public has a right to ask why.
These questions are not about politics. They are about governance.
Conclusion
Franklin residents deserve clear answers about the alleged misuse of public resources outlined in the West Allis Police search warrant. They also deserve clarity about why an alderwoman appears to possess or claim information that has not been publicly released — and why criticism is being redirected away from an elected official under investigation.
Accountability is not a campaign tactic.
It is a duty.
Franklin Community News will continue to report on this matter using public records, court filings, and verified sources.
Opinion: When the Chair of the Common Council Acts Like a Spokesperson, the Public Deserves Answers
Public office does not come with a license to manage narratives during criminal investigations — especially when the official doing the talking is not the one under scrutiny.
That concern becomes even more serious when the person speaking is the Chair of the Franklin Common Council.
As West Allis Police investigate Franklin Mayor John Nelson for possible misconduct in public office, the mayor has chosen not to speak publicly. That decision, while frustrating to some, is understandable during an active investigation.
What is not understandable is why Alderwoman Michelle Eichmann — the Chair of the Common Council — has repeatedly inserted herself into public discourse, challenging media coverage, questioning reporters, and redirecting scrutiny away from the mayor and toward a private publisher.
This is not a minor distinction.
The chair sets tone, standards, and expectations for the entire legislative body.
The Chair’s Role Is Oversight — Not Message Control
The Chair of the Common Council is not simply another alderperson with an opinion. The position carries heightened responsibility for neutrality, decorum, and public confidence — especially when City Hall is under investigation.
Yet Eichmann’s comments on FOX6 social-media posts did not seek clarity, transparency, or restraint. Instead, they questioned journalistic motives, speculated about investigative timelines, and suggested reporters should focus on someone other than the elected official named in a search warrant.
That behavior does not resemble oversight.
It resembles narrative management.
If the mayor has a spokesperson, the public deserves to know who that is. If he does not, then the Chair of the Common Council should not be filling that role informally on social media.
Claimed Knowledge Without Accountability
Equally troubling is what Eichmann’s comments imply.
She suggested knowledge of when the investigation began.
She implied awareness of what documents were offered — or declined — by FOX6.
She framed the absence of charges as meaningful, despite the existence of a search warrant.
None of that information has been publicly disclosed by West Allis Police. None of it has been confirmed by FOX6. And none of it was accompanied by sourcing, documentation, or an official explanation.
When the Chair of the Common Council implies inside knowledge of an active investigation, the public is entitled to ask how — and why.
Deflection Is Not Leadership
Redirecting public attention from an elected official under investigation to a private individual’s CCAP history is not governance. It is deflection.
Courts adjudicate cases.
Police investigate conduct.
Journalists report verified facts.
The Chair of the Common Council is expected to uphold institutional integrity — not to diminish scrutiny or cast accountability as political theater.
When accountability is framed as “campaign season” noise, it undermines the very principles local government depends on.
Silence From the Mayor Makes the Chair’s Conduct More Concerning
The mayor’s refusal to comment only heightens the concern.
If Mayor Nelson believes the investigation is unfounded, he can say so himself. If he believes silence is appropriate, then that restraint should extend to those who lead the council.
Selective silence — where the subject stays quiet but the chair speaks forcefully on his behalf — is not neutrality. It is strategy.
And strategy has no place in matters of public integrity.
The Standard Is Simple
Franklin residents are not demanding conclusions.
They are demanding transparency.
If officials believe reporting is inaccurate, they should rebut facts with facts — not insinuation, deflection, or personal redirection.
Words from the Chair of the Common Council carry weight. They signal priorities, loyalties, and institutional posture.
That weight must be used carefully.
Final Thought
This investigation is not about personalities. It is about public trust, public resources, and public accountability.
When the Chair of the Common Council repeatedly positions herself as a defender or surrogate for a mayor under investigation, the public is right to ask:
Who is she speaking for?
Why is she speaking now?
And under what authority?
Until those questions are answered, the issue is not the reporting.
The issue is the response.
This commentary reflects the views of Franklin Community News and is published as analysis alongside related reporting.
Dr. Richard Busalacchi is the Publisher of Franklin Community News, where he focuses on government transparency, community accountability, and local public policy. He believes a community’s strength depends on open dialogue, honest leadership, and the courage to speak the truth—even when it makes powerful people uncomfortable.
🕯️ The solution isn’t another insider in a new office. It’s sunlight, scrutiny, and the courage to vote differently.
Because until voters demand honest, transparent government, the corruption won’t stop — it will only change titles.
Elections have consequences — and Franklin’s next one may decide whether transparency makes a comeback.
💬 If you value hard-hitting, fact-based investigative reporting about our hometown of Franklin — follow Franklin Community News on Facebook.
Together, we can keep local government honest, transparent, and accountable
— for the greater good.
